DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600405
Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime
论文题名译名
混合管理：气候制度下的边界组织、科学政策和环境治理
摘要
The theory of boundary organizations was developed to address an important group of institutions in American society neglected by scholarship in science studies and political science. The long-term stability of scientific and political institutions in the United States has enabled a new class of institutions to grow and thrive as mediators between the two. As originally developed, this structural feature of these new institutions—that is, their location on the boundary between science and politics—dominated theoretical frame-works for explaining their behavior. Applying the theory of boundary organizations to international society requires a refocusing of some of the theory’s central features, however. In this article, I introduce a new framework—hybrid management—to explain the activities of boundary organizations in the more complex, contingent, and contested settings of global politics. I develop the framework of hybrid management using the specific example of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change’s Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice.
中文摘要
边界组织理论的发展是为了解决美国社会中被科学研究和政治学奖学金所忽视的一组重要机构。 美国科学和政治机构的长期稳定性使一类新的机构能够作为两者之间的调解人成长和繁荣。 按照最初的发展，这些新机构的这种结构特征——即它们在科学和政治之间的边界上的位置——主导了解释它们行为的理论框架。 然而，将边界组织理论应用于国际社会需要重新关注该理论的一些核心特征。 在这篇文章中，我介绍了一个新的框架——混合管理——来解释边界组织在更复杂、偶然和有争议的全球政治环境中的活动。 我使用联合国气候变化框架公约附属科学技术咨询机构的具体例子来开发混合管理框架。
来源智库
Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes (United States)
NSTL唯一标识符
JA202305040000010YJ
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。
