Climate protection is the most important reason for developing CO2 capture and storage.In particular sectors of the economy other economic incentives to capture CO2 already exist today (e.g. enhanced oil recovery).Attitudes towards the technology are not uniform in different groups of society. CCS is often described as a possible bridge to the era of renewable energy.Environmental organisations prioritise the further expansion of renewables and the full exploitation of energy-saving potentials. All environmental organisations reject the ideaof storing CO2 in the oceans. Adequate proof of long term stability is demanded for all storage options.
RECCS:strukturell-ökomisch-ökologischer Vergleich可再生能源技术（RE）mit Carbon Capture and Storage（CCS）
来源：The Energy Advocate一位美国领先的能源专家呼吁加大对碳捕获和储存（CCS）技术的投资，声称它可以以不到三分之一的成本提供电力。。。
桑托斯和海滩能源公司宣布了在南澳大利亚进行Moomba碳捕获和储存（CCS）项目的最终投资决定。桑托斯首席执行官Kevin Gallagher表示，投资决定是一个重要的。。。
澳大利亚，碳捕获和储存（CCS），氢，清洁氢是通过使用可再生能源生产绿色氢，或使用具有碳捕获和存储（CCS）的化石燃料生产蓝氢来生产的
Geoengineering is a catchword for a wide range of techniques, and it is becoming an international issue that will grow in importance as the costs of certain technologies fall or as greenhouse gas emissions continue to decline, making these techniques more attractive.
There are few credible scenarios for reaching the EU’s long-term climate policy objectives, such as net-zero by 2050, without the large-scale deployment of CCS technology. Carbon capture and storage technology is a pre-requisite for the decarbonisation of energy-intensive industries, which in the EU are responsible for about a fifth of all greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, carbon capture technologies have only been tested at smaller scales and are not yet available at scale for the multiple energy-intensive industries that need them. To prepare for larger-scale CCS deployment in the period after 2030, steps should be taken today to address economic as well as political barriers, and thereby support development of key infrastructure and technology. In doing so, policy should focus on improving the investment case for both CCS as well as low-carbon industrial products that carbon capture makes possible. This includes specific financing models that account for the high capital intensity of CCS, regional variation in industrial clusters, infrastructure and storage availability as well as the need to combine both private and public money.Recommendations:Plans for CCS deployment should be developed in parallel with analysis on the expected demand for negative emissions, as well as how to deliver these negative emissions. Imperfect capture rates and bio-energy with CCS (BECCS) use will impact this demand.Policy support should target the improvement of capture rates in major energy-intensive industries so that theoretical potentials can be demonstrated.To support scale-up, initial focus should be on industrial clusters where various sources of CO2 can be combined into larger volumes.EU state aid rules (e.g. environmental state aid guidelines) should facilitate member state spending to support CCS infrastructure development.Political choices should be made as to the market and financing models that will apply to CCS development, both on the capital investment side as well as on the operational financing side.
