印度洋-太平洋地区在地缘政治、经济和军事领域继续发展，成为全球和美国国家安全的一个日益重要的地区。展望2035年，竞争、危机和冲突的后果将继续加剧，特别是随着中国野心和国力的增强。印太地区的地理和政治环境将继续带来无数挑战，影响美国联合部队在战区内投射力量和行动的能力。总的来说，美国陆军为应对这些联合军事挑战提供了广泛而独特、支持和强化的潜在贡献。然而，随着美国陆军寻求在该地区传达其价值，这种广度可能会以清晰度为代价。因此，本报告的作者试图提供一个引人入胜的、结构化的叙述，以更清楚地描述美国陆军在当今和2035年在整个地区的作用。
Research Brief Photo by Senior Airman Trevor Gordnier/U.S. Air Force The expansion of Chinese military activities and capabilities in the Indo-Pacific region has led the United States to increase its own military activities in the region. This brief describes how the United States can select and shape its military activities to deter Chinese aggression against U.S. allies and partners while also limiting the risks of escalatory Chinese reactions. Grounded in 14 case studies of reactions by the People's Republic of China (PRC) to U.S. military activities and other events in the Indo-Pacific, this brief offers U.S. military planners a framework to identify the perceptions that are likely to cause an aggressive or escalatory response. The authors then discuss which potential U.S. military activities in the Indo-Pacific region could affect the perceptions—and thus the risk of an escalatory response. The research team created a typology of potential short-term responses—from least intense to most intense—in the political, economic, and military spheres. The team also considered potential longer-term responses in each sphere. This typology summarizes the menu of response options that the could select, depending on the perceptions, the U.S. activity characteristics, and the broader context in which the U.S. activities are undertaken. The authors outline the implications regarding general types of U.S. activities that could escalate tensions to various degrees, specific examples of U.S. activities that could do the same, and broader lessons for U.S. policymakers. This brief concludes with recommendations for U.S. military planners. Photo by Mass Communication Specialist Seaman Heather McGee/U.S. Navy Foundation for Understanding and Anticipating Responses The research team based its framework on an extensive analysis of documents, Chinese-language literature, English-language examinations of behavior, and 14 case studies—listed in Figure 1—of recent reactions to U.S. military activities and other events. This analysis, and the framework that arose from it, can help U.S. military planners anticipate China's likely responses to new or expanded U.S. military activities in the Indo-Pacific region. The framework provides a step-by-step guide for assessing likely responses to U.S. military activities. As noted, the framework consists of three main components: key perceptions that trigger Chinese responses to U.S. military activities key characteristics of U.S. military activities that influence China's behavior a typology of potential Chinese responses, organized by intensity level. Figure 1. Case Studies of Recent Reactions U.S. hypersonic weapon programs (ongoing since 2000) U.S. naval capabilities and the Malacca Dilemma (ongoing since 2000) China-Philippines Scarborough Shoal Standoff (ongoing since 2012) Japanese nationalization of the Senkaku Islands (2012–2016) Expansion of the U.S.-Vietnam defense and security ties (2013–2016) U.S. bomber overflights of the (2016 and 2020) deployment to South Korea (ongoing since 2016) Chinese reactions to the Duterte administration (2016–2018) The reinvigoration of the Quad (ongoing since 2017) U.S. support for Taiwan under the Trump Administration (2018–2020) Strengthening of U.S.-India ties (ongoing since 2018) Hong Kong and the Vanguard bank disputes (2019) Hong Kong and the China-India border clash (2020) U.S. in the Taiwan Strait (2020)
本文从发展的角度探讨了英国提出的“印太倾斜”。鉴于最近英国官方发展援助（ODA）的削减，我们询问英国如何更有效地利用印度洋-太平洋地区稀缺的发展资源，利用机会支持。。。
2018年5月，法国总统埃马纽埃尔·马克龙在澳大利亚悉尼花园岛海军基地发表演讲，概述了法国的印太战略。通过这次演讲，法国正式将自己定位为“印太大国”，成为第一个。。。
